400 research outputs found
Featherweight VeriFast
VeriFast is a leading research prototype tool for the sound modular
verification of safety and correctness properties of single-threaded and
multithreaded C and Java programs. It has been used as a vehicle for
exploration and validation of novel program verification techniques and for
industrial case studies; it has served well at a number of program verification
competitions; and it has been used for teaching by multiple teachers
independent of the authors. However, until now, while VeriFast's operation has
been described informally in a number of publications, and specific
verification techniques have been formalized, a clear and precise exposition of
how VeriFast works has not yet appeared. In this article we present for the
first time a formal definition and soundness proof of a core subset of the
VeriFast program verification approach. The exposition aims to be both
accessible and rigorous: the text is based on lecture notes for a graduate
course on program verification, and it is backed by an executable
machine-readable definition and machine-checked soundness proof in Coq
Modular, Fully-abstract Compilation by Approximate Back-translation
A compiler is fully-abstract if the compilation from source language programs
to target language programs reflects and preserves behavioural equivalence.
Such compilers have important security benefits, as they limit the power of an
attacker interacting with the program in the target language to that of an
attacker interacting with the program in the source language. Proving compiler
full-abstraction is, however, rather complicated. A common proof technique is
based on the back-translation of target-level program contexts to
behaviourally-equivalent source-level contexts. However, constructing such a
back- translation is problematic when the source language is not strong enough
to embed an encoding of the target language. For instance, when compiling from
STLC to ULC, the lack of recursive types in the former prevents such a
back-translation.
We propose a general and elegant solution for this problem. The key insight
is that it suffices to construct an approximate back-translation. The
approximation is only accurate up to a certain number of steps and conservative
beyond that, in the sense that the context generated by the back-translation
may diverge when the original would not, but not vice versa. Based on this
insight, we describe a general technique for proving compiler full-abstraction
and demonstrate it on a compiler from STLC to ULC. The proof uses asymmetric
cross-language logical relations and makes innovative use of step-indexing to
express the relation between a context and its approximate back-translation.
The proof extends easily to common compiler patterns such as modular
compilation and it, to the best of our knowledge, it is the first compiler full
abstraction proof to have been fully mechanised in Coq. We believe this proof
technique can scale to challenging settings and enable simpler, more scalable
proofs of compiler full-abstraction
Static Analysis of Run-Time Errors in Embedded Real-Time Parallel C Programs
We present a static analysis by Abstract Interpretation to check for run-time
errors in parallel and multi-threaded C programs. Following our work on
Astr\'ee, we focus on embedded critical programs without recursion nor dynamic
memory allocation, but extend the analysis to a static set of threads
communicating implicitly through a shared memory and explicitly using a finite
set of mutual exclusion locks, and scheduled according to a real-time
scheduling policy and fixed priorities. Our method is thread-modular. It is
based on a slightly modified non-parallel analysis that, when analyzing a
thread, applies and enriches an abstract set of thread interferences. An
iterator then re-analyzes each thread in turn until interferences stabilize. We
prove the soundness of our method with respect to the sequential consistency
semantics, but also with respect to a reasonable weakly consistent memory
semantics. We also show how to take into account mutual exclusion and thread
priorities through a partitioning over an abstraction of the scheduler state.
We present preliminary experimental results analyzing an industrial program
with our prototype, Th\'es\'ee, and demonstrate the scalability of our
approach
CapablePtrs: Securely Compiling Partial Programs using the Pointers-as-Capabilities Principle
Capability machines such as CHERI provide memory capabilities that can be
used by compilers to provide security benefits for compiled code (e.g., memory
safety). The C to CHERI compiler, for example, achieves memory safety by
following a principle called "pointers as capabilities" (PAC). Informally, PAC
says that a compiler should represent a source language pointer as a machine
code capability. But the security properties of PAC compilers are not yet well
understood. We show that memory safety is only one aspect, and that PAC
compilers can provide significant additional security guarantees for partial
programs: the compiler can provide guarantees for a compilation unit, even if
that compilation unit is later linked to attacker-controlled machine code. This
paper is the first to study the security of PAC compilers for partial programs
formally. We prove for a model of such a compiler that it is fully abstract.
The proof uses a novel proof technique (dubbed TrICL, read trickle), which is
of broad interest because it reuses and extends the compiler correctness
relation in a natural way, as we demonstrate. We implement our compiler on top
of the CHERI platform and show that it can compile legacy C code with minimal
code changes. We provide performance benchmarks that show how performance
overhead is proportional to the number of cross-compilation-unit function
calls
Secure Compilation (Dagstuhl Seminar 18201)
Secure compilation is an emerging field that puts together advances in
security, programming languages, verification, systems, and hardware
architectures in order to devise secure compilation chains that
eliminate many of today\u27s vulnerabilities.
Secure compilation aims to protect a source language\u27s abstractions in
compiled code, even against low-level attacks.
For a concrete example, all modern languages provide a notion of
structured control flow and an invoked procedure is expected to return
to the right place.
However, today\u27s compilation chains (compilers, linkers, loaders,
runtime systems, hardware) cannot efficiently enforce this
abstraction: linked low-level code can call and return to arbitrary
instructions or smash the stack, blatantly violating the high-level
abstraction.
The emerging secure compilation community aims to address such
problems by devising formal security criteria, efficient enforcement
mechanisms, and effective proof techniques.
This seminar strived to take a broad and inclusive view of secure
compilation and to provide a forum for discussion on the topic. The
goal was to identify interesting research directions and open
challenges by bringing together people working on building secure
compilation chains, on developing proof techniques and verification
tools, and on designing security mechanisms
Abstract Congruence Criteria for Weak Bisimilarity
We introduce three general compositionality criteria over operational
semantics and prove that, when all three are satisfied together, they guarantee
weak bisimulation being a congruence. Our work is founded upon Turi and
Plotkin's mathematical operational semantics and the coalgebraic approach to
weak bisimulation by Brengos. We demonstrate each criterion with various
examples of success and failure and establish a formal connection with the
simply WB cool rule format of Bloom and van Glabbeek. In addition, we show that
the three criteria induce lax models in the sense of Bonchi et al
The Belgian Electronic Identity Card: a Verification Case Study
In the field of annotation-based source code level program verification for Java-like languages, separation-logic based verifiers offer a promising alternative to classic JML based verifiers such as ESC/Java2, the Mobius tool or Spec#. Researchers have demonstrated the advantages of separation logic based verification by showing that it is feasible to verify very challenging (though very small) sample code, such as design patterns, or highly concurrent code. However, there is little experience in using this new breed of verifiers on real code. In this paper we report on our experience of verifying several thousands of lines of Java Card code using VeriFast, one of the state-of-the-art separation logic based verifiers. We quantify annotation overhead, verification performance, and impact on code quality (number of bugs found). Finally, our experiments suggest a number of potential improvements to the VeriFast tool
- …